The latest issue of the ETUC's collective bargaining bulletin warns that the European Commission is trying to re-focus the European employment guidelines around towards more flexible working practices, making it easier for employers to fire workers while at the same time reformulating workers' security as the security to be able to move into a new job. The bulletin explains that a key element of the approach is to use indicators developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development which, according to the ETUC, “suffers from a fundamental bias. It is constructed to advance the case and the interest of business without any consideration for the interest of labour. Using this indicator in the Employment strategy will come at the expense of key workers' rights”
Read more at > ETUC (EN)
ETUC issues warning about Commission's flexicurity strategy
More like this
ETUC clarifies "flexicurity" debate
The latest collective bargaining information bulletin from the ETUC looks at the question of flexibility and security in terms of employment protection in the Nordic countries. The bulletin points out that they do appear to offer employees less legal job protection than other European states such as Germany, France and Spain. However, job protection provisions in collective agreements play a more important role in the Nordic countries, requiring considerable advanced notice and a range of measures to help workers find new jobs. [Read more at > ETUC (EN)->http://www.etuc.org/IMG/pdf/2006_3
ETUC carries out flexicurity survey
As part of a joint project with European employer organisations, the ETUC is involved in a survey on flexicurity. The questionnaire has been sent to trade union confederations and so if any EPSU affiliates want to influence the responses from their country they will need to contact their trade union confederation. The survey asks about the main national measures and trends; the role of the social partners in initiating and influencing policy and practice on the main components of the flexibility and security agenda; and overall opinions on flexicurity. [Read more at > EPSU (EN)->http://www