In the lead up to a national demonstration over reforms to pay and the career structure in public administration, the STAL public sector union criticised the minister for local government for failing to meet with trade unions to discuss the problems facing the sector. The union says that over a three-year period the minister has met with unions only twice and has displayed an arrogant attitude towards the unions' attempts to negotiate over these issues.
Read more at > STAL (PT)
Union criticises minister for absence of social dialogue
More like this
Union challenges bonus scheme to reduce sickness absence
The FOA public services union is critical of an initiative to reduce sickness absence by the Billund local authority in the Southern Denmark region. The council is paying an attendance bonus and it may be taken up by other municipalities. FOA argues that if sickness absence seems to high then there this raises questions about management responses and understanding the causes. The union makes the point that it people should not be forced to go to work if they are ill, particularly when they are working with the young, the sick and the elderly who would be more vulnerable to any contagious
Union criticises minister for proposing cut in recruitment
The CSC public services federation has attacked economy minister Vincent Van Quickenborne for arguing that public sector recruitment should be cut, with the filling of only one vacancy in every three. The union says that such a policy cannot be applied wholesale across the civil service without affecting service quality. It also points out that the minister fails to take account of the fact that around 40% of public sector workers are due to retire in the next five years and that there is an urgent need to respond to this with policies allowing for a transfer of knowledge and expertise from
Health unions criticise lack of social dialogue and block on unions
Health unions came together with representatives of trade union confederations to criticise a proposed amendment to the Health Care and Insurance Act. The unions argue that the amendment is effectively revenge for recent trade union protests against government policy and that it will deny trade unions and workers representation on health institution management bodies. Trade unions and confederations across all sectors have been engaged in protests over the refusal of the government to engage in social dialogue. This is just the latest example of the government failing to consult and putting